Contextualization Comes Home

Most missionaries are familiar with the concept of contextualization, choosing appropriate expressions of Christianity in fallen human culture. While missions studies focus heavily upon contextualization, the concept is frequently overlooked in pastoral studies. Even in missions studies, there often seems to be an underlying assumption that contextualization is (at least relatively) unneeded in the West. For example, the Incarnational Ministry model compares adapting the gospel to a new cultural setting to Christ’s adoption of first-century Palestinian culture. Some presentations tacitly give the impression that the missionaries’ native Western cultures share the perfection of Christ’s native heavenly culture.

In the June 2012 edition of Christianity Today, Thomas E. Bergler wrote and article titled When Are We Going to Grow Up? The Juvenilization of American Christianity. Bergler challenges the assumption that American Christians can give their culture a pass. Bergler writes,

Beginning in the 1930s and ’40s, Christian teenagers and youth leaders staged a quiet revolution in American church life that led to what can properly called the juvenilization of American Christianity. Juvenilization is the process by which religious beliefs, practices, and developmental characteristics of adolescents became accepted as appropriate for adults. It began with the praiseworthy goal of adapting the faith to appeal to the young, which in fact revitalized American Christianity. But it has sometimes ended with both the youth and adults embracing immature versions of the faith (19).

Bergler traces how American culture has shifted in recent decades towards an adolescent mentality and how the church has mirrored that shift. He notes, “not surprisingly, in the process of adapting to the new immature adulthood, churches started looking a lot like youth groups” (23). These changes resulted in unintended theological consequences. Bergler argues that “Juvenilization tends to create a self-centered, emotionally driven, and intellectually empty faith” (23). One researcher “labeled this pattern of religious beliefs Moralistic Therapeutic Deism” (24). Christianity becomes primarily about being good, helping people, and acknowledging a God sitting on the sidelines of everyday life.

Bergler calls for Christian leaders to combat this problem by returning to doctrine and critiquing their surrounding cultures. He writes,

We need to ditch the false belief that cultural forms are neutral. Every enculturation of Christianity highlights some elements of the faith and obscures others. We must be vigilant and creatively compensate for what gets lost in translation when we use the language of youth culture. For example, if we sing songs that highlight the emotional consolations of the faith, what can we do to help young people also embrace the sufferings that come with following Jesus?

Later in the June 2012 edition of Christianity Today, John Ortberg observes, “In many ways, I think the discussion of juvenilization is more like the missiological discussion of contextualization than anything else. Because we increasingly live in a post-Christian culture, any church leader must seek to discover how to contextualize the gospel to our culture. And our culture is a youth-worshiping, Justin Bieberized, Twilight-Hunger Games-Kardashian culture” (27). American Christians must not underestimate the depravity of their culture if they hope to live in the world while not becoming of the world.

Technology and the Human Heart

David Pogue recently wrote an post titled Hate Mail and the New Religious Wars in Tech. Pogue argues that people’s opinions on technology are largely determined by what they have already purchased. The amount of money being invested fuels the passions that inevitably flair in tech debates.

When you buy a product, you are, in a way, locking yourself in. You’re committing to a brand. Often, you’re committing to thousands of dollars in software for that platform, or lenses for that camera, or e-books for that reader. You have a deeply vested interest in being right. Whenever somebody comes along and says, in print, that there might be something better – well, that’s scary.

In that case, you don’t just perceive the commentator to be putting down your gadget. He’s putting you down. He’s insulting your intelligence, because that’s not the product you chose. He’s saying that you made the wrong choice, and all of those thousands of dollars of apps and lenses and books were throwing bad money after good. He’s saying you’re a sap.

Who would have thought? Even in the twenty-first century, our hearts reside in the same places as our treasures. I remember reading about that somewhere….

In Defense of Superstition

On April 6, 2012, the New York Times published an essay titled “In Defense of Superstition” by Matthew Hutson.

Hutson argues that everyone believes in the supernatural to some degree. Spiritual beliefs are not only inevitable but also beneficial–even when those beliefs misrepresent reality. Nobody can can enjoy a sense of control or meaning without being at least modestly superstitious.

Hutson reports how the psychological effects of superstition improves sports performance and reduces anxiety through offering a sense of control. Superstition also enables people to cope with disaster by allowing them to attach meaning to their misfortune. Furthermore, regardless of how irrational spiritual beliefs may seem, everyone is religious to some degree. When faced with pressure, uncertainty, and loss, people expose their core beliefs, and those beliefs always include some supernatural element. Contrary to the claims of skeptics, religious people are not insane. Spiritual belief makes sane behavior possible.

Romans 1:18-32 teaches that all people know God instinctively but suppress that knowledge because they want to do wrong. Hutson points out areas where even the most ardent atheists cannot consistently maintain their self-deception. Theologians call such inconsistencies evidence of common grace, where God restrains the effects of the fall. From a Christian perspective, Hutson’s argument implies that unbelievers rely heavily on God’s common grace, even for their own sanity.

The Church and Social Media

The May 2012 edition of the Harvard Business Review contains an article titled “To Keep Your Customers, Keep It Simple” by Patrick Spenner and Karen Freeman.

Spenner and Freeman argue that companies should not attempt to build online relationships with their customers. Research suggests that customers who use the internet are more concerned with easy access to trustworthy information than being part of an online community. Marketers are actually driving customers away “with relentless and ill-conceived efforts to engage” (110).

Companies frequently misunderstand why their customers connect with them online. Spenner and Freeman researched why customers followed companies on social sites like Facebook and Twitter. They then contrasted the results with companies’ preconceptions. Most companies placed a premium on their customer’s three least important reasons to connect. The research found that relatively few online users were motivated by the desires to “feel connected” (33%), “submit ideas” (30%), or “be part of a community” (22%).

Such research should come as welcome news to church leaders who feel increasing pressure to embark on the bewilderingly vague task of constructing an online community. This article implies that few people go to church websites to be a part of a community. When people want community, they get in their cars and drive to church.

Spenner and Freeman conclude with three helpful suggestions that have applications for churches seeking to develop an online presence.

1. Aid Navigation

Most visitors to your church’s website page will be interested in general information. Can people quickly find your church’s service times and address? Do you provide a FAQ page to address their most important concerns? Of course, your website and social networking connections may offer more, but make sure your basic info is always easily accessible.

2. Build Trust

In a culture bombarded by ads, people put little trust in companies’ descriptions of their own products and services. Spenner and Freeman admonish companies to “build cadres of trustworthy advisers…and make it easy for consumers to discover and use it” (113). Churches should invest less time in writing promotional materials and instead encourage their congregations to create their own posts, tweets, and videos about the church. The church’s social media outlets can then simply direct visitors to more trusted sources.

3. Simplify Differences

Many online visitors will want to know what makes your church different, so tell them. Explain doctrinal differences, cultural preferences, and unique features of your church. Unless you are e-harmony, people aren’t coming to your site looking to fulfill their need for a relationship. Churches should keep their online messages quick, diverse, and simple.

The Atheist in the Next Pew

The June 2012 edition of Psychology Today contains an article titled “The Atheist at the Breakfast Table” by Bruce Grierson.

Grierson chronicles and advocates a quiet segment of the new atheist movement.  While aggressively confrontational atheists such as Hitchens and Dawkins have been snatching up headlines, the more important story on the rise of atheism in American culture is being played out in churches and religious families. Grierson documents how many atheists in America actively practice religion and argues that more should at least be apathetic towards religion.

Grierson doesn’t discover any groundbreaking reasons for maintaining religious involvement despite not believing in God. The quiet atheists practice religion because they appreciate the moral causes, parenting helps, family involvement, and traditions that they cannot find anywhere else. They dress up, sing hymns, contribute money, volunteer, and even make use of religious language. However, this growing population doesn’t believe that God exists; they just don’t care enough to cause a fuss.

Christians should not imagine that their conservative churches are filled exclusively with fellow believers. The thought of quiet atheists in our midst should not spark witch hunts. Quiet atheists don’t care enough about God to voice their disbelief. Pastors need not go on the war path with sermon series on apologetics. Quiet atheists don’t care enough about God to engage in philosophical debates. Rather than accusing and lecturing one another, Christians must kindle a convictingly apparent passion for God. Quiet atheists need to be confronted by a genuine and passionate love for God.

People are attracted to others who are like them. Perhaps quiet atheists are increasingly feeling comfortable in church because Christians are increasingly caring less and less about God. How much of our time is spent in practical atheism? Are we living as though God did not exist? If we want to reach the atheist in the next pew, we need to become consumed by our passion for God. Our love must be apparent to all and affect every part of our lives.